Why Women Should Not Be Assigned to Combat Positions

Throughout history, w anticipate have play a situation in the defense of their farmings. In 1429, Joan of Arc successfully led the French Army into difference against the English at get along 17. In 1588, Queen Elizabeth I traveled to Tilbury, Essex to fight beside her Army during the Spanish raid. And in 1788 at the Battle of Monmouth, Mary Ludwig Hayes, also known as Molly Pitcher, took over her hus put awayds cannon sight and continued to engage the enemy after he had f every last(predicate)en in battle.While these be extraordinary accomplishments made by these most admirable women, should this level of close rubbish be expected, or possibly point undeniable of women in the military? Many will argue that the ban on women in assail is a discrimination issue, and that it creates a morphologic barrier that can hurt their chances of promotion or advancement. The Defense part Advisory Committee on Women in the Services developedly frame that women serving in combat in Ira q and Afghanistan have had a affirmatory impact on mission accomplishment. unless these women were non depute to an actual combat arrangement in a unit that has a base mission of direct terra firma combat engagement of the enemy. They were either assigned to a combat tin unit that was engaged by the enemy, or they were addicted to the combat arms unit. There is a vast difference, and this raise will explore why placing women in direct combat roles in the military would have a negative impact on combat solidifying. All male units in the field experience bonding that enhances readiness and cohesion.When women are introduced, men stop relating to each separate and begin trying to attract the women. This puts them in direct competition with each other and becomes a severe distraction from the mission at hand. Morale cannot be hold if accusations of harassment are a threat, and Commanders are unable to keep the males concentrate on the mission when they are at war with each other over a charwomanly person unit member. Helen of Sparta was perhaps the most godly character in all literature, ancient or modern. A square war, one which lasted for ten years, was fought over her (Bell, 1991, p. ).King David of Israel ordered Uriah the Hittite into battle to fight in order to commit adultery with Uriahs married woman in his absence. He would even wage war against another nation in order to eliminate any competition for his women. But a relationship with a supervisor or a co-worker is pestiferous to teamwork and fairness in the workplace. A lack of trust or attainable resentment toward another soldier can possibly result in poor judgment in the heat of battle when someone decides they are mad at the man that got the girl.Disrespect among the ranks, mistreatment of fellow unit members, and terminal of professional reputations will surely affect the career progression of everyone involved. And what happens to the effectuality of the unit when a female com bat soldier gets pregnant? ocean ships at war must return to shore because of the pregnancy of female sailors, gum olibanum hindering the combat mission. Infantry units must evacuate the female soldier out of the war zone and reassign her to a support position back in the States. The disruption to combat readiness is uttermost(prenominal) and can be costly. Chivalry is not dead.The basic, instinctual nature of males is to protect females. This is confessedly of any species of animal. Parents raise their sons to protect women, and to ensure their safety because they are little capable of protecting themselves. While this may not be align of all women, it is certainly true of all men. In the New York clock article, Female POW is Abuse, Kindling Debate, by Ellaine Sciolino, Army Major Rhonda Cornum was interviewed assureing her imprisonment during the Persian Gulf War. She said Everyones made such a loose deal or so this indecent assault, she said, in her first interview sin ce the war. But the only thing that makes it indecent is that it was nonconsensual. I asked myself, Is it going to prevent me from acquiring out of here? Is there a risk of death attached to it? Is it permanently disabling? Is it permanently disfiguring? Lastly, is it excruciating? If it doesnt fit one of those five dollar bill categories, then it isnt important. But the male soldier that was with her had a different opinion.The 22-year-old medical specialist from Fort Rucker whom Iraqis slapped and beat during interrogations said he had not changed his opinion that omen should not be in combat, despite what he described as Major Cornums stoicism. I worried about her all the time, he said, and creation a P. O. W. and going through the torture, the pain, you shouldnt also have to worry about whats happening to the female soldier all the time. While the women may be able to endure such atrocities that come with war, the men are not psychologically prepared to deal with listening to the screams of their women being raped, sodomized, and tortured by the enemy. Then there is the moral question behind women in combat units.The question isnt necessarily whether a woman can do it, but whether she should do it. Assigning them into these positions would require training men and women to regard the brutalization of women, and a womans brutalization of others, as universal and acceptable (Kirkwood, 2003, p. 1). According to Vietnam War hero Ron Ray, Women should only be used in combat if national security depends on it. This means that all of our men have been killed or captured, and the only possibility of survival is leftover with the women and children.Even then it should be a last resort. There is something loathly in the mouths of society in turning a woman into the diverseness of person that is capable of performing such heinous actions that are required in close ground combat against another human being, bandage being expected to nurture our children on ce she returns from such brutal actions. Women by nature are the nurturing gender. What will this do to our society of educate human beings if we turn our women into barbaric warriors? Women certainly play a significant role in todays armed forces.On a distinguished scale they have been instrumental in improving the readiness of their organizations, relegate enabling them to perform on the asymmetrical battlefield. But placing them into close ground combat positions will not improve the readiness or writ of execution of the armed forces. The presence of women in combat units creates sexual tension that eventually puts one man against another in direct competition for her, thus affecting morale and cohesion. As prisoners of war, women will put their male counterparts at risk because a mans instinct is to protect the woman rather than complete his mission and overcome the enemy.As a civilized society, it is morally wrong to place a woman into a position where she could be brutal ized, or where she would have to brutalize another. They simply are not emotionally or psychologically equipped to do that, and nor should they be. But in the quest for equality of the sexes, placing women in combat units isnt the answer. It should still quell more important to maintain military tradition and combat effectivity than it is for social experimentation.