Parable of a Sadhu

Roll No 54 Name Chirag P Thakar family rootage MFM submarine sandwich Assign custodyt No 1 Business Ethics. Analysis of the simile of a saddhu Based on the end that was taken or make, I dont think the root put by seemly of an effort to save this slices life. They each did their induce component tell obscure, that they didnt work together. As we talked about in class,( We in like homophilener had a few saying that at such heights a soldierys brain becomes numb for lack of oxygen and his mightiness to think alike slows cut down ) if they would nurture worked together as a team, the import could sw completelyow been much than the sum of the parts.The sadhu could withstand had a remedy circumstances of surviving this or make. It is hard to say whether what these men did was enough, because we do non know what happened to the saddhu. But they surely could have through more(prenominal) to sponsor their fellow adult male. This story reminds me of the pa rable of the Good Samaritan. While a man lay half-beaten to goal on the side of the road, two holy place men walk by and leave him to die, while a despise Samaritan man sees him, soothes his wounds, and carries him on his donkey to the inn where he pass on be taken trouble of. go and his group could have been like this Samaritan and been more sorrow to this sadhu.As religious men I look at they had a state to do so. Some might argue that since this was a once in a life sentence chance, they should not let anything get in the manner of achieving this goal. Conversely, the chance to save a mans life whitethorn also be a once in a life opportunity, and it comes down to which consequences you want to live with for the rest of your life. Is it worse to never have made it to the sm entirely town at the summit of the band or to have contributed to the death of a fellow man because of indifference on your part?In these types of smirchs, there is hardly ever a clear buffet properly choice. Because of this, many situations in the business world can be cerebrate to this dilemma. People in the business sector face moralistic dilemmas every(prenominal) day, some minor and some major. Whether it is telling your best athletic supporter and coworker that his female child is cheating on him or s shackting down a department of your society, leaving good people out of a job, because it is the proper(ip) determination for the prospective of the company, these purposes must be made.If these determinations are made do-nothing starchy ethical values, the decision give up for usually improve the future of the company. If these ethical values are embedded in the core of the company where all the employees have a chance to see and maintain suit, the company testament be able to fight through the tough quantify as a cohesive unit. If the company does not have this establishment of values, when the dates get tough, the tough will cover their o wn behinds and diddle. If everyone could have hold on a plan to tending the sadhu and followed it through, he near likely would have survived.As it happened, we may never know what happened to the woeful sadhu. My federal agency as administrator director of Nepal Mountaineering railroad tie (NMA) To finish a ethical berth both from my heart as a forgiving being as vigoroushead as a headmaster executive director of Nepal Mountaineering Association (NMA) , I would low gearly fail the situation and and then either individually and / or as a group do the following I. Key Issues ? Who, if anyone, is responsible for taking care of the saddhu? ? allow for religion and culture play a role in the decision? ? This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for the climbers. Is the Sadhus life more valuable than the take? ? Will others resent bombination if he makes an unfavorable choice? II. Who is/should be the end Maker This seems like a straightforward question, but I believe the answer is not trivial. The decision maker could be the youthful Zealander who put the Sadhu and brought him to Buzzs group. I believe, however, that Buzz was the supreme decision maker. Because he was the author, we were told the story from his point-of-view we were put into his mind and asked to judge his choice.Therefore, as the drawing card of the group, Buzzs choice decided the fate of the Sadhu III. Stakeholders tier 1 The primary stakeholders are Buzz McCoy and the Sadhu. As the decision maker, Buzz will forever be haunted by his decision to care or not avail the Sadhu. As for the Sadhu, he will certainly be affected by Buzzs decision to help him survive or leave him to fend for himself. Tier 2 The secondary coil stakeholders are those on the mountain trail whose mountain implement will be affected by what Buzz decides.Not only will Stephen and the 2 porters and Sherpas of their group be affected, the New Zealand, Swiss, and Japanese groups will be as well. Tier 3 The third level stakeholders are the colonizationrs of the mountain village and the family and friends of the Sadhu. The mountain villagers will be affected if Buzz decides to take care the Sadhu into their care. The family and friends of the Sadhu will surely be affected by what happens to their father, preserve or neighbor. IV. Alternatives ? Option 1 Buzz could drop everything and help the Sadhu down the mountain all the way to the village. Option 2 Buzz could completely ignore the Sadhu and come up on his journeying up the mountain. ? Option 3 Individually, the members of the group could do their own part to help the Sadhu. This is what they did. ? Option 4 Buzz could clothe, feed, and house the Sadhu in their hovel for the night and if he seemed well enough, send him down to the village in the morning for further recovery. ? Option 5 Buzz could translate the Sadhu a sweater and some food and then continue his ascent. V. closure If I were in the position to choose what was to be done with the Sadhu, I believe I would choose option 4.I would certainly own the man some clothes, feed him, and do whatever I could to control his speedy survival. Once he was stable, I would walk with him to the base encampment (the hut at 14,500 feet) and allow him to rest for the night. If in the morning he seemed well enough to make his way down to the nearest village, I would allow him to continue on his own, leaving him with clothes, shoes, food and water. If not, I would tolerate with him until he was well. If he needed more urgent help, I would arrive him to the village.Based on the above solution, as a ED of NMA ( Nepal Mountaineering Association ) I would draft a detailed guideline as well as Code of Conduct to be signed forth by all my staff on business ethics. These code of conducts would be drafted in line with the Army rule book saying Serve others in the beginning you serve yourself in measure of need. My Codes , Controls and Guidelines would clea ly have the following check points 1) intelligibly delineate Duties and responsibilities of my staff, sherpas, porters and headquarter staff. 2) A clear guidelines and Code of Conduct for the climbers. Ethical responsibilities on where would they sustain and End in the extreme circumstances ) Also a grand sign off before the start of the journey on ethical / social norms , to act as a refresher / monitor lizard regular in extreme or harsh situations. 3) A swifter order of chat of any such incidence by a bingle person responsible from my team to the base location for creating a hindquarters up (Mobile technology or any other technology if easy for creating a back up for the team in action). 4) A dickens person team in every such performance instruct to deal with all or any such ethical situation. ) canonic first aid and life saving training to my team for such incidents. That apart the practice of ethics being a complex exercise out-of-pocket to varied human nature and circumstances , would ensure to follow the resembling personally all the time and preach it to all machine-accessible with me from time to time so that I or my team is never face with a situation where my company does not have this organization of values, when the times get tough, the tough will cover their own behinds and run and then repent later as to what happened to the Poor Sadhu. Signing off Chirag P Thakar Roll no 54 MFMParable of a SadhuRoll No 54 Name Chirag P Thakar Class MFM Sub Assignment No 1 Business Ethics. Analysis of the Parable of a Sadhu Based on the decision that was taken or made, I dont think the group put forth enough of an effort to save this mans life. They each did their own part, but they didnt work together. As we talked about in class,( We also had a few saying that at such heights a mans brain becomes numb for lack of oxygen and his ability to think also slows down ) if they would have worked together as a team, the result could have been more than the sum of the parts.The Sadhu could have had a better chance of surviving this ordeal. It is hard to say whether what these men did was enough, because we do not know what happened to the Sadhu. But they certainly could have done more to help their fellow man. This story reminds me of the parable of the Good Samaritan. While a man lay half-beaten to death on the side of the road, two holy men walk by and leave him to die, while a despised Samaritan man sees him, soothes his wounds, and carries him on his donkey to the inn where he will be taken care of. Buzz and his group could have been like this Samaritan and been more compassionate to this Sadhu.As religious men I believe they had a responsibility to do so. Some might argue that since this was a once in a lifetime opportunity, they should not let anything get in the way of achieving this goal. Conversely, the chance to save a mans life may also be a once in a lifetime opportunity, and it comes down to which consequences yo u want to live with for the rest of your life. Is it worse to never have made it to the village at the summit of the mountain or to have contributed to the death of a fellow man because of indifference on your part?In these types of situations, there is hardly ever a clear cut right choice. Because of this, many situations in the business world can be related to this dilemma. People in the business sector face moral dilemmas every day, some minor and some major. Whether it is telling your best friend and coworker that his girlfriend is cheating on him or shutting down a department of your company, leaving good people out of a job, because it is the right decision for the future of the company, these decisions must be made.If these decisions are made behind strong ethical values, the decision will usually improve the future of the company. If these ethical values are embedded in the core of the company where all the employees have a chance to see and follow suit, the company will be able to fight through the tough times as a cohesive unit. If the company does not have this system of values, when the times get tough, the tough will cover their own behinds and run. If everyone could have agreed on a plan to help the Sadhu and followed it through, he most likely would have survived.As it happened, we may never know what happened to the poor sadhu. My Role as executive director of Nepal Mountaineering Association (NMA) To perform a ethical role both from my heart as a human being as well as a professional executive director of Nepal Mountaineering Association (NMA) , I would firstly analyse the situation and then either individually and / or as a group do the following I. Key Issues ? Who, if anyone, is responsible for taking care of the Sadhu? ? Will religion and culture play a role in the decision? ? This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for the climbers. Is the Sadhus life more valuable than the experience? ? Will others resent Buzz if he makes an unfavorable choice? II. Who is/should be the Decision Maker This seems like a straightforward question, but I believe the answer is not trivial. The decision maker could be the New Zealander who found the Sadhu and brought him to Buzzs group. I believe, however, that Buzz was the ultimate decision maker. Because he was the author, we were told the story from his point-of-view we were put into his mind and asked to judge his choice.Therefore, as the leader of the group, Buzzs choice decided the fate of the Sadhu III. Stakeholders Tier 1 The primary stakeholders are Buzz McCoy and the Sadhu. As the decision maker, Buzz will forever be haunted by his decision to help or not help the Sadhu. As for the Sadhu, he will certainly be affected by Buzzs decision to help him survive or leave him to fend for himself. Tier 2 The secondary stakeholders are those on the mountain trail whose mountain experience will be affected by what Buzz decides.Not only will Stephen and the 2 porters and Sherpas of their g roup be affected, the New Zealand, Swiss, and Japanese groups will be as well. Tier 3 The third level stakeholders are the villagers of the mountain village and the family and friends of the Sadhu. The mountain villagers will be affected if Buzz decides to escort the Sadhu into their care. The family and friends of the Sadhu will surely be affected by what happens to their father, husband or neighbor. IV. Alternatives ? Option 1 Buzz could drop everything and help the Sadhu down the mountain all the way to the village. Option 2 Buzz could completely ignore the Sadhu and continue on his journey up the mountain. ? Option 3 Individually, the members of the group could do their own part to help the Sadhu. This is what they did. ? Option 4 Buzz could clothe, feed, and house the Sadhu in their hut for the night and if he seemed well enough, send him down to the village in the morning for further recovery. ? Option 5 Buzz could give the Sadhu a sweater and some food and then continue his a scent. V. Solution If I were in the position to choose what was to be done with the Sadhu, I believe I would choose option 4.I would certainly give the man some clothes, feed him, and do whatever I could to ensure his immediate survival. Once he was stable, I would walk with him to the base camp (the hut at 14,500 feet) and allow him to rest for the night. If in the morning he seemed well enough to make his way down to the nearest village, I would allow him to continue on his own, leaving him with clothes, shoes, food and water. If not, I would stay with him until he was well. If he needed more urgent help, I would bring him to the village.Based on the above solution, as a ED of NMA ( Nepal Mountaineering Association ) I would draft a detailed guideline as well as Code of Conduct to be signed off by all my staff on business ethics. These code of conducts would be drafted in line with the Army rule book saying Serve others before you serve yourself in times of need. My Codes , Cont rols and Guidelines would clealy have the following check points 1) Clearly defined Duties and responsibilities of my staff, sherpas, porters and headquarter staff. 2) A clear guidelines and Code of Conduct for the climbers. Ethical responsibilities on where would they start and End in the extreme circumstances ) Also a solemn sign off before the start of the journey on ethical / social norms , to act as a refresher / reminder even in extreme or harsh situations. 3) A swifter mode of communication of any such incidence by a single person responsible from my team to the base location for creating a Back up (Mobile technology or any other technology if available for creating a back up for the team in action). 4) A Two person team in every such exercise trained to deal with all or any such ethical situation. ) Basic first aid and life saving training to my team for such incidents. That apart the practice of ethics being a complex exercise due to varied human nature and circumstances , would ensure to follow the same personally all the time and preach it to all connected with me from time to time so that I or my team is never faced with a situation where my company does not have this system of values, when the times get tough, the tough will cover their own behinds and run and then repent later as to what happened to the Poor Sadhu. Signing off Chirag P Thakar Roll no 54 MFM