How Will Bitcoin Impact Banks and Finance Structures?

How Will Bit funds Impact Banks and Finance Structures?What is finance, and how does crypto capital play in to our current understanding of itAt the actuate of the unit, one of the freshman concepts we were solicited to consider was a point that is exaltedly contended a philosophical irresolution which has never borne to a greater extent significance than it does today, with the recent emergence and explosive offset of cryptocurrencies. We were asked to consider what finance was, and how it fit into society. Now it would be prudent to ask what finance is, and how cryptocurrencies fit in to our current understanding of it. Let me start to answer this with a brief description of fiat currencies, or jural tenders, with no material measure out or lever redeemable for commodities.Historic tout ensembley, the survey of anations gold was pegged against a goodness with soundly-established value,such(prenominal) as gold or silver. This was the look for the majority of currenc ies upuntil 1971, when Richard Nixon decoupled the US dollar from gold. Supply and look at determines the value of fiat currency. G everywherenments can aver how muchis in circulation and control the value of silver as well as pompousness. One ofthe biggest d bearf altogethers of cryptocurrency according to its critics, is theinability of more tokens to enter circulation when demand is high. The total measuring of Bitcoin, is limited by a digital end product process analogous toprecious metal mining, which can stop its value from being eroded by systematicover-production and debasement as has been the fact with numerous fiatcurrencies historically.18 Thisinability to react to demand causes sharp excitableness in the value ofcryptocurrency, fashioning them unreliable farm animals of value. This has been mostevident with the instill spikes in Bitcoin value since the beginning of the year. Conversely,as fiat currencies argon non linked to physical reserves, they risk becoming worthless due tohyperinflation. If populate lose faith in a nations papercurrency, the bullion leave no longer hold value. Fiat money serves as a good currency if it can handle the roles that aneconomy needs of its pecuniary unit storing value, providing a numericalaccount and facilitating switch. Because fiat money is not a scarce or fixedresource like gold, authorized banks have much greater control over its supplement,which gives them the power to apportion economic variables such as credit supply,liquidity, interest rates and money velocity. Cryptocurrencies on the former(a) hand do not serve as a currency for oneparticular nation, and atomic enumerate 18 not controlled by any government body either.Instead they employ what is k todayn as blockchain technology, which is a form ofdigital ledger that is keep opened by all the users of the profit. An on-goingrecord of all deeds is kept and added to, each time a in the buff transactionoccurs. Despite this moreover t here is an inherently high level of anonymity,given that bitcoin, tezos etc. addresses ar not linked straight off to any personor entity. This also gives way to several problems for governments which argonunable to control inflation or the amount of cryptocurrency in circulation, resolving of earnings and tax, prohibition of calling illegal goods and moneylaundering. in that location atomic number 18 several safe-guards in place to ensure against branched-spendingand other fraudulent activities however which are built in to the blockchaintechnology. Further, as a result of this peer-to-peer cyberspace in whichcryptocurrencies operate, there is no single point of breakure, making it genuinelydifficult for the system to collapse.17What potential cause willing the use of cryptocurrency and alter of currency have, particularly on banks?The total value of allcryptocurrency in circulation is now$200 billion USD3. Eventhough this is almost double the value it was in July, it i s still trumped bythe value of paper USD do itd by the U.S. Federal Reserve, which alone amountsto just about $1.4 trillion. We are therefore nowhere to the highest degree the point yet wherecryptocurrencies pose a credible threat of follow central-bank-issuedmoney. Nonetheless it is worth thinking through both(prenominal) of the implications ifsomething like Bitcoin (which has about a 45% trade share of allcryptocurrencies) were to wholly or even partially supplant central bank fiatcurrency. The concur protocols that govern Bitcoin, Tezos and other cryptocurrencies, are effectively their monetary policy. In exchange for mining blocks of bitcoins and consuming computing power to verify the legitimacy of transactions, Bitcoin miners pass water paid in Bitcoin. These rewards increase the supply of Bitcoin, though the increase in Bitcoin money supply is inhibited by the increasing difficulty of collateral transactions. Increasing computational power is required to verify each transaction and mine new blocks to create new Bitcoins, meaning that the total supply of coins is gradually approaching the limit of 21 million coins (currently there are 16.5 million in circulation).Fiat money has its ownprotocols that stabilise inflation using interest rates and bond-buying, and themoney supply that results from this is commonplacely ignored. With cryptocurrencieshowever, money supply does not respond to shifts in money demand and with arelatively fixed supply, large fluctuations in value and prices result (in the foregoing 11 months the price of bitcoin has soared almost 8 fold5).This some argue, is specifically the discernment Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies willnot take over2 and makes Bitcoin impractical as a money. Cryptocurrencieshowever have proven to be a useful substitute to traditional reservecurrencies in places with poor monetary policy and bleached banks. In Kenya forexample, 1 in 3 people own a bitcoin wallet1, while in India, whererecently t here has been a significant famine in cash supply, greater numbersof people have born-again to the use of bitcoin.4If a particular hoidenish wereto adopt Bitcoin to replace its currency, the effects of doing so would likelybe felt by others in a knock-on effect. A larger credit cycle in one country wouldmean larger booms and busts for its trading partners. Foreigners outside thecountry that adopted the cryptocurrency, may also opt to deposit directlywithin that country and discontinue their own countrys banks in doing so thiscould affect the race of capital into and out of a their home country, furtheramplifying the credit cycle. The in vogue(p) difficulties with Bitcoin make theprospect of a crypto currency takeover nailm ideational at the moment, exactly ifsolutions to these problems were found or a new currency were devised withbetter protocols, central banks would have to resolve these dilemmas one way oranother. Financial history what can we learn from historical p ass offs and is it reasonable to envision the current growth as sustainable?Aneconomicor asset bubble,is trade inanassetat a price or price range that pissedly exceeds theassetsintrinsic value.It could also be set forth as a situation inwhich asset prices appear to be based on implausible or inconsistent viewsabout the future19. The general consensus among industry professionals, is that the currentcryptocurrency market is in an unsustainable phase of bubble growth6,7.There were 30 ICOs each launching new cryptocurrencies in July, then(prenominal)more than 50 in August. Part of this mania is based on venture. alone itsalso clear that there has been departure from a fundamental conjecture of whata cryptocurrency originally was a scarce digital commodity where the valuederived from its scarcity. To be frank, if more than one hundred new sources ofthis digital commodity have been launched since June, then the concept ofscarcity, and therefore the supposed inherent value, begins to erode. In fact,many of these newer cryptocurrencies will need to fail in order to maintain thevalue and viability of the most widely employ currencies, bitcoin and ether.These look to remain feasible over the intermediate and perhaps long-term, thoughnot necessarily at the current prices. History has shown us that the majorityof cryptocurrencies fail dismally at some point soon aft(prenominal) their conception16.Only a consume handful have shown consistent growth over the last a couple of(prenominal) years. Bitcoinitself has crashed significantly several times. Even so, though the coreblockchain technology odd skunk others, will provide value as a orphicinfrastructure underlying future applications.Though bitcoin has seenastronomical growth over the last year one of the major problems in its use isthe utmost(prenominal) volatility in its value. On April 8th 2013 for example,Bitcoin was valued at $215 USD, 8 days later this figure dropped to $63 USDthen seven months by and by this its price soared to $1,200 USD. This volatility wasin hindsight partly a consequence of strong speculative demand from buyers fora new and unknown technology. There arehowever, more fundamental problems that cause the value of Bitcoin tofluctuate. The algorithm that controls supply prevents the amount of Bitcoinfrom expanding to meet increases in demand. This inelasticity in supply leadsto price variations and also encourages speculation and excessive volatility,all of which render it unreliable as a store of value.7The cryptocurrency market is new and being filled with new currenciesalmost daily. As competition develops however and with wee history, few canvalue them correctly, foreshadow which currencies will succeed, and whether they areall part of a larger bubble that will eventually burst. History has shown however that new financialinstruments are the authors of financial bubbles be they options for tulipbulbs in the 1630s, fiat money in the manuscript bubble of the 1700s, stock inthe South Sea bubble, leverage in 1929 or collateralised debt instruments inthe credit crunch of 2007, the problem was the world was behind the knowledgecurve of the instrument and the power of greed drove the market wild andfinally into collapse.8 It would therefore not beunusual to see a similar crash with cryptocurrencies in the near future.Cryptocurrency regulation How is it affirmable to regulate an online currency based globally? In short, it isnt. The whole insert of cryptocurrencies is that theyare decentralized and ungoverned by any one government, but rather managed by apeer-to-peer network of users worldwide. The focus has thus shifted to the resoluteness and legality of investing in them through means such as ICOs andderivatives markets. In the largely unregulated world off cryptocurrencies, one issue remainsat the forefront of the attention of regulators such as the irregular (in the U.S.)and ASIC (in Australia), and that is in the nature of I COs, whether they areseeking genuine donations for the development of software, or whether they arein fact shares in a company or other investment, which contributors hope to redeemat a future battle for financial benefit an illegal and unregulated speculativeinvestment.Initial coin offerings have raised $3.6 billion USDso far this year15 with several currency developers generating vastamount of capital in a matter of hours with little more than a website and apromise of a revolutionary new product. This unchecked source of cluster-fundinghas been banned by several governments, as other countries regulatory bodies suchas the SEC and ASIC, have developed their own policies regarding theseofferings.On September 4th,China banned investment in ICOs citing breaches of securities laws and folie to economic and financial order13, and moved to shutdown cryptocurrency exchanges also.13 In July, the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission required companies to register ICOs in the same air as IPOs14. Following this ruling on September twenty-ninth, theSEC supercharged two companies with fraud and selling unregistered securities afterrunning sure-fire ICOs that collected more than $300,000 USD14.Substantial efforts have been made to legitimisecryptocurrency offerings by law firms such as Cooley in New York and otherswith vested interests in making ICOs work. Cooley attests that it has developeda simple agreement for future tokens (SAFT) framework that will allow tokensales to be compliant with US securities laws. This is important given thatseveral major ICOs had excluded US individuals from participating given thethen-standing issues with the SEC. If by drilling the SAFT framework the SEC issatisfied, then US investors would have access to more ICOs providing a major sourceof capital to them. The basic premise of the straightforward Agreement of Future Tokens(SAFT) is that the cryptotoken fail the Howey test, a measure of whether afinancial instrument is in fact a security. In order for tokens to fail thetest and not be considered securities, they must be delivered to investors solitary(prenominal)after a functioning product or service is in place. The network and the tokenmust be genuinely useful such that they are actually used on afunctional network, according to Cooleys framework. To date ICOs havedelivered tokens to investors before the launch of the underlying currency,meaning that the only real function tokens could have use for would be intrading in secondary markets, blatantly classifying them as securities. In the reason of Tezos, investorsbought into the put up hoping that the Tezos platform would be builtsuccessfully, and that by owning the tokens, also yet to be created, they wouldbecome stakeholders able to shape the final platform. One particular casehighlights the blatant regulatory arbitrage which is plain for all to see, andwhich the founders of Tezos attempted to suppress by consistently referring to theirICO contribut ions as non-refundable donations, in order to make ambiguous thenature of the security they were offering. Tim Draper, one of the main venturecapital backers, when asked by Reuters how much he had donated replied Youmean how much I bought? A lot.InAustralia, ASIC released a decisive factsheet on ICOs and their position,stipulating that ICOs must be conducted in a manner that promotes investortrust and confidence, and complies with the relevant laws11. ASIChas also warned that the Corporations Act may apply to an ICO depending on therights that attach to the coin from the ICO itself, rights to underlying coinsor rights on tokens used in the ICO. Likewise, ASIC has alsomade it clear that if an ICO is conducted to fund a company, then the rightsattached to the coins issued by the ICO may fall within the definition of ashare. Where it appears that an issuer of an ICO is actually making an offer ofa share, the issuer will need to fasten a prospectus as for any other IPO11,which will al lows investors the guard duty to withdraw their investment beforethe shares are issued should there be mislead or deceptive information inthe prospectus. Lastly it isworth noting that some ICOs have been described by their initiators as a formof meeting funding. In Australia, ASIC has made a clear distinction between crowdfunding using an ICO and crowd-sourced funding (CSF) that has been regulatedby the Corporations Act since 29th September 201711.Under the new laws, CSF will be a financial service where start-ups and smallbusinesses raise funds, generally from a large number of investors that investsmall amounts of capital. There will be specific rules for conducting CSF withfewer regulatory requirements than ICOs, while maintaining investor protectionmeasures. This is particularly of importance in the case ofTezos, where the developers sought donations to fund the development of theirnetwork, a deliberate misrepresentation which would now be both illegal andarguably unethical in Australia. REFERENCEShttps//www.huffingtonpost.com/ameer-rosic-/7-incredible-benefits-of-_1_b_13160110.htmlhttps//ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/06/07/2189849/guest-post-the-consequences-of-allowing-a-cryptocurrency-takeover-or-trying-to-head-one-off/https//coinmarketcap.com/all/views/all/https//news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-demand-rise-cash-run-dry-india/https//au.investing.com/currencies/btc-aud-historical-datahttps//www.coindesk.com/comes-cryptocurrency-bubble/http//www.cityam.com/1408388669/why-bitcoin-won-t-be-money-future-cryptocurrencies-might-behttps//www.forbes.com/sites/investor/2017/05/31/cryptocurrency-is-a-bubble/4501c7dc33b1https//www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-27/cryptocurrency-derivatives-you-bet-this-trader-has-295-returnhttps//ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/10/19/2195028/trouble-in-ico-paradise/http//asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/digital-transformation/initial-coin-offerings/https//qz.com/1091812/the-secs-ico-crackdown-may-be-avoided-by-the-saft-legal-framework/https// techcrunch.com/2017/09/04/chinas-central-bank-has-banned-icos/https//coinidol.com/icos-to-be-regulated-as-ipos-in-the-us/https//www.coinschedule.com/stats.phphttps//bitcoinexchangeguide.com/deadcoins/https//bitcoin.org/en/how-it-workshttps//3decuj2tc6bl1oljdt3zfwbb-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/Currency-Debasement.pdfhttps//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_bubble