The study of children and childhood

Why In A Society That Prides Itself On It s Democratic Values Should The Suggestion Of squirtren s Engagement Be So Contraversial?IntroductionUntil late geographers with specify paid light attending to the survey of kids and childhood ( mob, 1990 Sibley, 1991 Philo, 1992 and Winchester, 1991 ) . Whither surveies had been carried out, most were concerned with kids as future grownups and attending focused on their emerging accomplishments and cognitive breakment. R arly were kids studied for what they be, as active societal agents in their ain correctlyfulness, with their ain lives, brings and desires ( Corsaro, 1997 ) . With the cultural bend , kids have been ( rhenium ) positioned on the geographical schedule ( Aitken, 1994 Valentine, 1996a and Valentine, 1996b ) . One ground is that consideration of unlike low-level groups in society ( for illustration, grown females, minorities, the disabled ) has drawn attending to the ways in which society is constructed around societal and spacial premises. Constructivist and interpretative positions of this sort have led to a ack forthwithledgment that kids as a group be amongst the least powerful at bottom western societies ( James et al. , 1998 ) and yet, their experiences within topographic transmit and unnumerable have non been consistently examined. In effect, in that respect has been a rush of involvement in the mundane geographicss of kids ( Aitken, 1998 Matthews, 1995 Matthews and Limb, 1998 Matthews and Limb, in closet Matthews et al. , 1998 Sibley, 1995 Skelton and Valentine, 1997 Valentine, 1997a and Valentine, 1997b ) and vigorous averment for childhood infinite to be recognize as an of import dimension in societal and cultural possible action ( James and Prout, 1992 and James et al. , 1998 ) .Unlike separate(a) marginalised groups, nevertheless(prenominal), kids ar non in a place within most western societies to practise in into a duologue ( with grownups ) active their environmental concerns and geographical demands. In this understanding, kids occupy a particular place of exclusion. Their ability to dispute the conventions of dominant governmental orientation course from within, together with the patterns and procedures which lead to their socio-spatial marginalization, is largely beyond their appreciation. Children as outsiders demand Alliess and geographics with its concern with the policy-making transaction and power of infinite and spatial position ( Painter and Philo, 1995 ) is good positioned in this regard. Just as feminist geographers have developed their surveies to turn to issues of adult females s re reconcileation and intimacy in socio-spatial decision-making, so geographers analyzing kids need to construct upon their surveies to build on the issue of kids s rights. We contend that the argument most kids s scrap ( or insufficiency of employ ) in society and macrocosm policy devising is primeval to an apprehension of the modern-day geographics of kids and childhood. In the remainder of this assignment we develop these thoughts, within a cross-cultural model.The right to state about elaborations associating to the lumber of carriage is a basic piece right ( Archard, 1993 ) . Although this of import rule of citizenship and of the democratic ethos was embedded in the linked Nations Universal resolving power of Human Rights ( 1948 ) , it was non until the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child ( UNCRC ) in 1989 that kids s right to take part in society was steadfastly realized. aboard members on proviso, protection and attention, the UNCRC sets out a figure of duties on the rights of meshing by gullible large number. Of primary importance are the undermentioned ArticlesThe Children battle ControversyEngagement implies processes of usage, shared duty and active battle in determinations which affect the quality of life. For the UNCRC engagement provides a mechanism for n on merely safeguarding the best involvements of the kid ( Article 3 ) , but besides for guaranting that kids s positions and sentiments are disposed regard. However, whilst at that place has been broad acclamation and support within the UK for twain other major rights of childhood identified by the UNCRC, that is, the rights to protection and proviso, there is less consensus about the impression of engagement.In malice of a dissemble mansion house in favor of kids s rights to take part, there remains an intransigency in some quarters about whether such political engagement is appropriate. Lansdown identifies three grounds why some grownups are loath for kids to take portion in decision-making that will impact on their ain life and the lives of others ( Lansdown 1995, p. 20 ) . First, giving kids the right to state threatens the harmoniousness and stableness of firm life by naming into inquiry parents natural authorisation to thrust up ones mind what is in the best involv ements of a kid. further, as Qvortrup et al. , ( 1994 ) suggest, to support such an statement, it must be beyond sensible uncertainty that grownups assume with kids s best involvements in head. In pattern, this is non ever the instance. Second enforcing duties on kids detracts from their right to childhood, a period in life which is supposed to be characterised by freedom from concern. Such a position ignores the fact that umpteen kids s lives are full of legitimate concerns which are merchandises of the same societal and economic forces that affect grownups. A 3rd strand to the statement is that kids freighter non hold rights until they are capable of taking duty. This position is based on an idealized position of childhood, yet few kids live without duties. Alanen ( 1994 ) points out that kids s labor and responsibilities within the place are underestimated, whilst the world of school manoeuvre and its associated duties are rendered un come upable by the label education .A 2nd, though related, statement against kids s engagement is based on a blind d break awayk belief that kids are incapable of sensible and coherent decision-making, an incompetency helpless by their deficiency of experience and a likeliness that they will do errors. Furthermore, if kids are left to the freedom of their ain inabilities the consequences are likely to be harmful ( Scarre, 1989 ) . Franklin and Franklin ( 1996 ) pull attending to a scope of libertarian unfavorable judgments of these two point of views. As a starting point, kids are invariably doing rational determinations impacting many another(prenominal) parts of their day-to-day lives ( some trivial, some less so ) without which their lives would hold small significance, order or attentive. In conduct-on, grownups are oft non good decision-makers and history bears this out. Indeed, this observation provides an inducement to let kids to do determinations so that they may larn from their errors and so develop goo d decision-making accomplishments. More radically, it has been argued that the circumstances of doing errors should non suspend engagement, as such an premise confuses the right to make something with making the right thing ( Franklin and Franklin 1996, p. 101 ) . Critics besides draw attending to the bing allocation of rights harmonizing to age, which is flawed by flightiness and incompatibility. For illustration, within the UK a adolescent psyche is deemed reprehensively responsible at the age of 10, sexually competent at the age of 16, but non politically responsible until the age of 18, when all of a sudden, without preparation or dry run, unripe volume enjoy the right to suffrage. Last, by denying rights of engagement to everyone under the age of 18 assumes a homogeneousness of emotional and rational demands, accomplishments and competencies. Furthermore, we contend that both places are imbued with an adultist premise that kids are non societal histrions in their ain rig ht, but are adults-in-waiting or gentlemans gentleman becomings. Minimizing kids in this manner non merely fails to admit that kids are the citizens of today ( non tomorrow ) , but besides undervalues their true potency within society and obfuscates many issues which challenge and threaten kids in their here and now ( Matthews and Limb, in imperativeness ) .Engagement And Representation Of Children Within The UKIn this subdivision we review unseasoned race s engagement and representation within the UK, separating between engagement at the field of study and local anaesthetic degree. At the subject area degree, a figure of political observers draw attending to a spell neutrality by light-green good deal in all battles political ( Bynner and Ashford, 1994 Fur dour and Cartmel, 1997 and Furnham and Stacey, 1991 ) . A deficiency of political consciousness, political apathy and low degrees of political engagement are claimed as platitude. A recent societal attitudes study ( W ilkinson and Mulgan, 1995 ) cross-fileed that 45 % of under 25s did non vote in the 1992 election compared to 31 % in 1987 and merely 6 % of 15-34 class olds describe themselves as very interested in political relations . It would look that an full coevals is choosing out of political relations ( Barnardo s, 1996 ) .Yet there is ample grounds to propose that if immature commonwealth are given more duties and more opportunity to take part in the running of society, so they will be more willing to lock in the procedures of democracy ( Hodgkin and in the buffell, 1996 ) . For illustration, in individual issue administrations where immature nation are encouraged to take portion, rank statistics confirm a turning engagement rate. Amnesty Inter topic s youth subdivision change magnitude from 1300 in 1988 to 15,000 in 1995 Greenpeace s materialization person rank rose wine from 80,000 in 1987 to 420,000 in 1995 and Friends of the Earth describe a growing of 125,000 new immatu re members over the same period ( British younker Council, 1996 ) . Hodgkin and Newell ( 1996 ) strongly assertOur society is in some danger of infantilising kids, of presuming an incapacity long past the day of the month when they are more capable. It is a affair of common sense, and the natural good pattern of many parents populating with kids and many professionals works with kids, to listen to kids and to promote them to take duty for determinations wherever possible. The results are unremarkably better and, even if things go incorrect, larning from errors is an indispensable portion of festering ( p. 38 ) .Indeed, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, the inter study organic structure which was set-up to supervise the motion of the Convention, expressed concern in its meeting in January 1995 about the deficiency of advancement made by the UK Government in following with its rules and criterions. In peculiar, attending was drawn to the inadequacy of steps associating to the operationalisation of Article 12. It recommended thatgreater antecedency be given to Article 12, refering the kid s right to do their positions known and to hold those positions given due weight, in the legislative and administrative steps and in policies undertaken to implement the rights of the kid. ..and went on to propose thatthe State ships company see the possibility of set uping farther mechanisms to ease the engagement of kids in determinations impacting them, including within the household and the community.. ( United Nations, 1995, p. 15 ) .The instance for immature people s closer representation and engagement in political procedures, peculiarly at a national degree has been taken up by a figure of runing administrations. First moves pre-date the UNCRC, when, in 1975, the National Council for Civil Liberties ( now Liberty ) proposed a Children s Rights Commissioner to move as a national advocator for kids, but the intention did non progress beyond the parliame ntary heraldic bearing phase ( Rodgers, 1979 ) . Recently, the purpose of set uping a national Commissioner has gained renewed drift. diminutive to this impulse was the publication of Taking Children naughtily A proposal for a Children s Rights Commissioner ( Rosenbaum and Newell, 1991 ) . In this elaborate survey the writers make a emphatic instance for reform. They suggest that it is kids s exposure to mistreatment, the deficiency of co-ordination across regime sections in proviso for kids, kids s complete deficiency of political rights, and the demand to guarantee long-run authorities conformity with the UNCRC which make the instance for setting-up the smirch of Commissioner so necessary ( Franklin and Franklin, 1996 ) . Among the Commissioner s functions would be the remit to affect immature people every bit closely as possible in decision-making at assorted degrees. This would affect the administration of local and national forums for immature people the constitution of c onsultative groups to see policy and pattern and the widescale candidature of immature people for their positions and sentiments.As a effect of this publication the run for a statutory, independent office of Children s Rights Commissioner was launched in the same twelvemonth. The proposal is supported strongly by all major kid public assistance and kid protection bureaus, four Royal Colleges of Health, local authorization associations and many professional kids s administrations ( Children s Rights note, 1997 ) . The constitution of the Children s Rights Office in 1995 and its appellation of a full-time officer to run for a Children s Commissioner gave added weight to the cause. In an effort to travel the run frontward the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation set up an enquiry which consulted widely in the UK and oversea about participatory constructions. Their study ( Hodgkin and Newell, 1996 ) non merely highlighted the modest extent of inter-ministerial and inter-departmental co-or dination of kids s personal businesss and the ad hoc nature of the allotment of some duties ( an result of there being no lead Department for kids ) , but besides pull attending to a scope of efficacious authorities constructions for kids already straightforward elsewhere 1.The right to state organizational constructions for kids s engagement and representationa exceptional encouragement to the run for better representation for immature people has been provided by New Labour. Their 1992 Manifesto proposed seting in topographic point a look for Children ( Lestor, 1995 ) , although this proposition was absent in the 1997 Manifesto. Whilst there are tag that the present authorities is sympathetic to the creative activity of such a station, at present, the official place is that they are in a procedure of listening ( Hewitt, 1998 ) . This deficiency of advancement has prompted other runing administrations to take up the cause. The 2020 Vision course is being organised by the Indus trial Society as a consequence of a concern that immature people s voices are seldom heard in political, economic and societal arguments. Amongst their purposes is to set in topographic point a Minister for Youth to coordinate policy and action ( Industrial Society, 1997 ) .At the local degree, nevertheless, there are promoting marks that attitudes are altering with respect to the engagement of immature people in decision-making. There are a figure of associated grounds for such a development. First, the impulse given to immature people s rights in ordinary by the UNCRC has been added to by the rules set by local anesthetic Agenda 21. Amongst its many declarations for a sustainable hereafter is the position that duologue should be established between the youth community and authorities at all degrees which enables immature people s positions and visions to be incorporated as a affair of class into future environmental policy ( Freeman, 1996 ) . Second, local authorities shake-up h as provided a stimulation for preteen person issues to be addressed in a strategic mode, partially through a demand to show community audience and partially to undertake what is perceived to be the tender person job ( Griffin, 1993 and Wynn and White, 1997 ) . Third, there is the millennium factor as we move towards the bend of the century at that place seems to be an emerging sense that the hereafter is for our kids ( Hackett, 1997 and Storrie, 1997 ) and local decision-making is critical to immature people s wellbeing. As portion of this motion towards giving immature people a enjoin has been the development of young person councils/forums. The term council/forum is used here to depict the scope of ways in which folds of immature people come together, normally, but non entirely, in commission, to voice their positions about their demands and aspirations ( in their societal and somatogenic universes ) .A recent study ( Matthews and Limb, 1998 ) has revealed that there are ov er two hundred young person councils within the UK, although these have developed in different ways. A figure of national administrations have played of import functions in their development, but a effect of their varying attacks is an variability of proviso within the four place states. In England, the National Youth Agency ( NYA ) and the British Youth Council ( BYC ) provide advice and information on petition about young person councils. The Wales Youth Agency ( WYA ) has a similar remit. These are bureaus, which although advocates of immature people s engagement, have limited capacity to back up development. Because of this, the development of young person councils in England and Wales has mostly been a haphazardly one. Their signifier and character depending partially on such factors as the human ecology, political makeup and traditions of a vicinity, and partially on bing institutional and organizational constructions and magnetic persons. In Scotland developments are more c onsistent. Here a federation between the Scottish companionship program line Council ( SCEC ) , Youth Link Scotland and the master(prenominal) Community Education Officers Group, which followed four old ages of research and audience, gave rise to the associate Youth programme, launched in 1995. Targeted at 14-25 twelvemonth olds, this programme seeks to advance effectual engagement of immature people in the decision-making processes which affect their lives and to prosecute immature people in finding their positions on services and the development of chances for raise community engagement ( SCEC, 1996 ) . By far the longest history of young person councils in the UK, nevertheless, is within Northern Ireland. In 1979 the Department of Education established the Northern Ireland Youth Forum ( NIYF ) , with a specific truncated to promote the development of a web of Local Youth Councils ( LYC ) . The intent of the LYCs was to acquire immature people involved in undertaking local issues and to guarantee that their voices were heard by local District Councils. The NIYF, on the other manus, took on a broader function and attempted to supply a national platform for immature people s issues. Presently being discussed are proposals to acquire youth representatives on each District Council and the formation of a Northern Ireland Youth Parliament.DecisionThe multiple discourse about immature people s engagement and representation generates equivocal docket. For those who feel that immature people are incapable of take parting or who question the rightness of their engagement, the deficiency of chances and inducements for representation within the UK is non deemed to be job. On the other manus, for those who see engagement to be the basis of democracy and inclusive citizenship, the UNCRC has become a rallying point, opening up new ways of believing about immature people s rights. The diverseness of position, nevertheless, between those who see engagement as a craf t apprenticeship and a acquisition scheme ( Storrie, 1997, p. 65 ) and those who consider it to be a truly empowering experience and as a opportunity to redefine the constructions which include immature people, confounds the manner frontward. Yet, there is a turning acknowledgment that within the UK immature people are non given the regard or listened to with the earnestness that they deserve ( Lansdown, 1995 ) . The lie of consecutive authoritiess in non setting-up either an independent Commissioner for Children or a Minister for Children and the deficiency of a consistent national model for young person councils, confirms this position. This is non the instance in many parts of mainland Europe. Here, there is ample grounds of effectual ombudswork, national models for the co-ordination of immature people s personal businesss and good established participatory constructions which operate at a grass-roots degree. At a broader international have table, excessively, there is grounds that the Articles of the UNCRC are making out to integrate turning Numberss of immature people global. We suggest that the UK has much to larn from these experiences and until this happens, immature people will stay mostly unseeable in public-policy devising at all degrees. Finally, in this paper we have attempted to demo that surveies about kids s engagement and representation in society are inherent to the emerging geographics of kids. Not merely do they supply a keener grasp of the historical and cultural relativity of childhood, but they besides add insight into procedures which marginalise and exclude.MentionsAitken, S. , 1994. Puting Children in Their Place. Association of American Geographers, Washington, DCAitken, S. , 1998. Family Fantasies and Community Space. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickAlanen, L. , 1994. Gender and coevals feminism and the child inquiry. In Qvortrup, J. , Bardy, M. , Sgritta, G. , Wintersberger, H. ( Eds. ) , puerility Matters complaisant Th eory, Practice and Politics. Avebury Press, Aldershot, pp. 27-42Archard, D. , 1993. Childs Rights and puerility. Routledge, capital of the United KingdomRams, P. , 1962. Centuries of Childhood. Jonathan Cape, LondonBarnardo s, 1996. preadolescent People s Social Attitudes. Barnardo s, LondonBritish Youth Council, 1996. junior People, Politics and Voting. British Youth Council, LondonBynner, J. and Ashford, S. , 1994. Politicss and engagement. Some ancestors of immature people s attitudes to the political system and political activity. European Journal of Social Psychology 24, pp. 223-236.Castellani. G. , 1997. The Italian experience of kids s councils. Paper presented at the Congress of Local and regional government activity of Europe, Budapest, OctoberChildren s Rights Office, 1997. Personal communicatingCorsaro, W. , 1997. The Sociology of Childhood. Pine Forge Press, constant of gravitation Oaks, CACouncil of Europe, 1993. The development of an incorporate attack to youth be aftering a local degree. European Steering Committee for Intergovernmental cooperation in the Youth Field, StrasbourgCox, R. , 1996. determine Childhood. Themes of Uncertainty in the History of Adult- Child Relationships. Routledge, Londonde Winter, M. , 1997. Children as chum Citizens Engagement and Commitment. Radcliffe Medical Press, OxfordEnnew, J. , 1995. Outside childhood street kids s rights. In Franklin, B. ( Ed. ) , The enchiridion of Children s Rights Comparative Policy and Practice, Routledge, London, pp. 201-215Flekkoy, M.G. , 1991. A Voice for Children talk Out As Their Ombudsman. Jessica Kingsley, LondonFlekkoy, M.G. , 1995. The Norse experience of kids s rights. In Franklin, B. ( Ed. ) , A Handbook of Children s Rights. Routledge, London, pp. 176-187Franklin, A. , Franklin, B. , 1996. Turning strivings the developing kids s right motion in the UK. In Pilcher, J. , Wagg, S. ( Eds. ) , Thatcher s Children Politicss, Childhood and Society in the 1980s and 1990s. Falme r Press, London, pp. 94-113Franklin, B. ( Ed. ) , 1995. The Handbook of Children s Rights Comparative Policy and Practice. Routledge, LondonFreeman, C. , 1996. Local Agenda 21 as a vehicle for promoting kids s engagement in environmental planning. Local Government Policy Making 23, pp. 43-51.Freeman, M. ( Ed. ) , 1996. Children s Rights. Dartmouth, AldershotFurlong, A. , Cartmel, F. , 1997. Young People and Social Change. Open University Press, BuckinghamFurnham, A. , Stacey, B. , 1991. Young People s Understanding of Society. Routledge, LondonGriffin, C. , 1993. Representations of Youth. formula Press, CambridgeHackett, C. , 1997. Young people and political engagement. In Roche, J. , Tucker, S. ( Eds. ) , Youth and Society. acute/Open University, London, pp. 81-88Hart, R. , 1992. Children s Engagement From Tokenism to Participation. International Child Development Centre/ UNICEF, FlorenceHart, R. , 1997. Children s Engagement The Theory and Practice of Involving Young Citizens in Community Development and Environmental Care. Earthscan/ UNICEF, LondonHewitt, P. , 1998. Response to a Question at the Launch of the ESRC Research Programme, Children 5-16 Turning into the twenty-first Century. perform House, Westminster, JanuaryHodgkin, R. , Newell, P. , 1996. Effective Government Structures for Children. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, LondonHolt, J. , 1975. Escape from Childhood. Harmondsworth, PenguinIndustrial Society, 1997. talking up, Talking out the 2020 Vision Programme, Summary Report. The Industrial Society, LondonJames, A. , Prout, A. , 1992. Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. Falmer Press, LondonJames, A. , Jenks, C. , Prout, A. , 1998. Speculating Childhood. Polity Press, CambridgeJames, S. , 1990. Is there a topographic point for kids in geographics. Area 22, pp. 278-283. stick immortalize in Scopus Cited By in Scopus ( 33 )Jodry, C. , 1997. Youth engagement and the function of ANACEJ. Paper presented at the Congress of Local and regiona l Authorities of Europe, Budapest, OctoberJones, G. , Wallace, C. , 1992. Young person, Family and Citizenship. Open University Press, BuckinghamLansdown, G. , 1995. Taking Part Children s Engagement in Decision Making. IPPR, LondonLestor, J. , 1995. A curate for kids. In Franklin, B. ( Ed. ) , A Handbook of Children s Rights. Routledge, London, pp. 100-106Ludescher, M. , 1997. The Swiss young person parliament motion. Paper presented at the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe, Budapest, OctoberSaint matthews, H. , 1984. Environmental noesis of immature kids images of journey to school and place country. Minutess of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 9, pp. 89-106.Saint matthews, H. , 1987. Gender, place scope and environmental knowledge. Minutess of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 12, pp. 43-56.Saint matthews, H. , 1992. Making Sense of Topographic point kids s apprehension of large-scale environments. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hem psteadSaint matthews, H. , 1995. Populating on the confine kids as foreigners. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 86 5, pp. 456-466.Saint matthews, H. and Limb, M. , 1998. The right to state the development of young person councils/forums in the UK. Area 30, pp. 66-78.Saint matthews, H. , Limb, M. , in imperativeness. Specifying an docket for the geographics of kids. Advancement in Human GeographySaint matthews, H. , Limb, M. and Percy-Smith, B. , 1998. changing universes, altering topographic points the microgeographies of adolescents. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 89 2, pp. 193-202.Ministry of Children and Family Affairs, 1996. The Ombudsman for Children and Childhood in Norway. Norse Official Report, OsloOakley, A. , 1994. Womans and kids foremost and last analogues and differences between kids s and adult females s surveies. In Mayall, B. ( Ed. ) , Children s Childhoods Observed and Experienced. The Falmer Press, London, pp. 13-32Painter, J. and Philo, C. , 1995. Spaces of citizenship an debut. Political Geography 14, pp. 107-120.Philo, C. , 1992. neglected rural geographicss. Journal of Rural Studies 8 2, pp. 193-207.Pollock, L. , 1983. Forgotten Children. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeQvortrup, J. , Bardy, M. , Sgritta, G. , Wintersberger, H. ( Eds. ) , 1994. Childhood Matters Social Theory, Practice and Politics. Avebury Press, AldershotRodgers, R. , 1979. A new ombudsman guardian of kids s rights? . Where? 152, pp. 267-271.Rosenbaum, M. , Newell, P. , 1991. Taking Children Seriously A Proposal for a Children s Rights Commissioner. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, LondonRoy, A. , 1997. Appraisal of the instruction execution of the European Charter on the Participation of Young People in Municipal and Regional Life. Council of Europe, StrasbourgScarre, G. , 1989. Children. Parents and Politics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeScottish Community Education Council, 1996. Connect Young person a national ent erprise to advance greater engagement of immature people. Progress Report, SeptemberSibley, D. , 1991. Children s geographicss some jobs of representation. Area 23, pp. 269-270.Sibley, D. , 1995. Families and internal modus operandis building the boundaries of childhood. In Pile, S. , Thrift, N. ( Eds. ) , Maping the Subject Geographies of Cultural Transformation. Routledge, London, pp. 123-137Skelton, T. , Valentine, G. ( Eds. ) , 1997. Cool Topographic points Geographies of Youth Cultures. Routledge, LondonSommerville, J. , 1982. The Rise and Fall of Childhood. Sage, LondonSpanish Youth Council, 1997. hypertext absent protocol //www.childhub.ch/webpub/crhome/crin_eu/cje.htmSir leslie stephens, S. , 1995. Children and the political relations of civilization in late capitalist economy . In Sir leslie stephens, S. ( Ed. ) , Children and the Politicss of Culture. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp. 38-55Storrie, T. , 1997. Citizens or what? In Roche, J. , Tucker, S. ( Eds. ) , Youth and Society. Sage/Open University, London, pp. 59-67United Nations, 1995. Reasoning Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, CRC/C/15/Add.34Urban Childhood Conference, 1997. University of Trondheim, Norway, JuneValentine, G. , 1996. Angels and Satans moral landscapes of childhood. Environment and Planning D 14, pp. 581-599. Position Record in Scopus Cited By in Scopus ( 100 )Valentine, G. , 1996. Children should be seen and non heard the production and evildoing of grownups public infinite. Urban Geography 17 3, pp. 205-220. Position Record in Scopus Cited By in Scopus ( 115 )Valentine, G. , 1997. My boy s a get by giddy . My married woman s a spot napped gender, kids and civilizations of rearing. Gender, Place and Culture 4 1, pp. 37-62. Full Text via CrossRef View Record in Scopus Cited By in Scopus ( 62 )Valentine, G. , 1997. Oh yes I can . Oh no you ca nt . Children and parent s apprehen sions of childs competency to negociate public infinite safely. Antipode 29 1, pp. 65-89. Position Record in Scopus Cited By in Scopus ( 104 )Varzegi, Z. , 1997. The partnership of Youth and Children s Councils, Hungary. Paper presented at the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe, Budapest, OctoberWilkinson, H. , Mulgan, G. , 1995. Freedom s Children. Demos, LondonWinchester, H. , 1991. The geographics of kids. Area 23, 357-360Wynn, J. , White, R. , 1997. Rethinking Youth. Sage, London